Getting over a Betrayal Essay Example for Free

Getting over a Betrayal Essay This song brings forth a feeling of that even though a loss of a loved one is a heart wrenching experience there is nothing a person can do to change the outcome of what has happened. My Immortal† seems to be more about losing ones own sense of identity and self-worth due to the loss and/or betrayal of a loved one than about the actual loss of the loved one: These wounds won’t seem to heal/ This pain is just too real/There’s just too much that time cannot erase (7-9) By the end of the song, the survivor of the story is emotionally drained and paralyzed with the fear by the memory of the betrayer. The survivor of the incident just wants those memories of hurt and betrayal to go away. This pain is felt in the opening stanzas of the song. And if you have to leave/I wish that you would just leave/Your presence still lingers here/ And it won’t leave me alone (3-6). The theme of â€Å"My Immortal† is the struggle of trying to get rid of the feeling of betrayal and of guilt. The betrayer has hurt or betrayed her in a way that she can never recover from the emotional damage. You used to captivate me/ By your resonating light/ Now I’m bound by the life you left behind (14-16) For the rest of the girls’ life, she will be imprisoned by him. She sacrificed everything for him. After years of being together, he throws everything she has done for him back in her face. She know feels like that she will never be free of him Your face it haunts/My once pleasant dreams (15, 16) The effect of this song brings forth many different emotions. This song brings to light that if one lets a past betrayal or losses rule their life, there will never be any peace for the individual. The individual needs to let go of the hurt, even though they are feeling that they were alone the entire time they were with that one person. I’ve tried so hard to tell myself that you’re gone/ But though you’re still with me/ I’ve been alone all along ( 24-26) It hurts being betrayed by a loved one. The reality that she was all alone in her love when he was with her and ironically, now that hes left her, she isnt alone: He torments her with the memories of his betrayal (perhaps complicated by her genuine love for who she thought he was. ) These wounds won’t seem to heal/ This pain is just to real/ There’s just too much that time cannot earse (21-23) Works Cited Evanescence.

islam in the united states Essay -- essays research papers

The biased and discrimination in United States have always been done with the minority. Muslims have always been a minority in this country throughout time. They have faced discrimination in society and especially from the government and media. I believe that people running this country are Anti Islamic due to there view on things. Also this is a Zionist country, which is another reason that makes the media discriminate against the Muslim’s, due to the conflict with Palestine and other Muslim countries. The media has always portrayed Islam in a negative way. The reason the media is biased when it comes to Islam because they hate the Islamic structure and the beliefs. The majority of media conglomerate ownership is of people who consider themselves as Zionists. They are the big owners and of course will want to get their views across in any way possible, even if that means to discriminate a certain group of people. One of the biggest reason this country is against Islam, is because of the Islam’s Social System. It is very different then how this country wants you to live your life. Another reason which this conflict occurs is because due to the fact that you cant find further truth the n the Quran compared to Bible or Torah or any other books. All three of them are books of GOD, and his message. Torah is known as the old testament, then cam e the Bible, new testament, and Quran is the final testament and has the final message which is a lot easier to follow, making Islam the fastest growing religion of United States and also the world. That is why Islam is hated by the western world and is always portrayed as a killer disease. Promoting Islam is all for violence and kill people and how the term â€Å"JIHAD† is so misused in today’s western society. Without knowing or having two bits of knowledge of Islam, that this religious revolves around PEACE. The social system in Islam is geared towards the preservation of the human race. It is uniquely built around the concepts of responsibility. Unlike the capitalistic concept of 50% shared activity, Islam defines the specific duties of each person and holds him or her equally important in the progress of society. Social disease such as crime and violence, drugs and alcoholism, rape and sexual harassment, teenage pregnancy and homosexuality are the norms of the Western life. Islam provides a strong foundation for a high... ...e help of United States. Saddam Hussein was helped put in power by United States. Mohammad Karzi the president of Afghanistan was put in power by United States. These people who are putting leaders in Islamic countires are against Islam and it’s belief that is why the media portrays Islam in the most negative way possible, because the government pretty much runs the Media. 1. Nizam al-Din al-Naysaburi, Ghara'ib al-Qur'an wa Ragha'ib al-Furqan, Cairo, 1962; Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masaahif, p.12, in Arthur Jeffery, Materials for the History of the Text of the Qur'an, Leiden: Brill, 1937; and Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi, Al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qur'an, Cairo, 1957, Vol.1, p.240 respectively 2. ISLAMIC SOCIAL SYSTEM. 20 August 1997. IBN MUHAMMAD. 30 Nov. 2004 3. Nonviolent Action and Third Party Role in Islamic World. 20 October 2000. Sezai Ozcelik. George Mason University/Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution.. 30 Nov. 2004. http://www.geocities.com/tatarkirim/islam5.html 4. Material on the Authenticity of the Qur'an. 1998, 1999, 2000 Muslim Answers. Abdur-Raheem Green. 30 Nov 2004. http://www.muslim-answers.org/proofs10.htm 5. The Holy Book of Quran. The citations are given.

Alliances Balancing and Bandwagoning

Stephen M. Walt’s main purpose in his work is to assert his explanations for the actions done by states in the international arena with regard to their alliances as a response to a certain factor or condition that affects or influences the very well being and situation of a state.The entire point of Stephen M. Walt revolves around the reaction of states when engaged or met with external threat. His analysis illustrates the possible behavioural patterns of states by explaining what kind of actions these states make and why.He thus caters two concepts; balancing and bandwagoning, stating that states tend to either balance or bandwagon depending on where these states perceive that they best fit or may benefit from. Therefore, he develops his analysis by proposing that the states two primary options or actions are to either ally in opposition of an external threat or to ally with the external threat itself. Stephen M. Walt holds that these two concepts are dependent upon the type and level of external threat manifested to them.This is not to discount the fact that the state’s influence, power or how the international community perceives it must also be taken into consideration; whether a state is considered as a strong state or a weak state.In a nutshell, Stephen M. Walt submits that a state may ally with other states in the face of an existing threat or it may arrange itself with this threat. He thus primarily asserts that as part of the natural behavioural pattern of a state, other theorists may say that balancing shall be the more convenient or expected action by a state rather than bandwagoning.It is fundamental to hypothesize that a strong state shall have the automatic tendency to balance. While the weak states may also choose to balance but this is only as a response to other weak states. When the conflict is between a weak and a strong state, it is another story.It is but natural in such a situation for a weak state to bandwagon when respondin g to a threat posed by a strong state. Stephen M. Walt’s alliance theory explains that a state’s action when responding to an external threat is the phenomenon of knowing when will such a state form an alliance and what will influence the state’s choice in making an alliance.This phenomenon is an expected behavioural pattern and a normal reaction. The focal area of concern with regard to this phenomenon is focused mainly on the each state’s duty and responsibility to protect itself. As a means of security, the state will be expected to put its safety as the first priority when an external threat is lurking around.The decision that follows shall take in consideration the state as a whole and how it is perceived by the international community. Primarily, the argument that pushes the theory of Stephen M. Walt falls largely on the shoulders of the two concepts of balancing and bandwagoning.As mentioned earlier, balancing is about allying with other states aga inst the external threat. In other words, states form an alliance against another state or group of states that pose the dominant and greater threat.This is simply a way for a state to deal with another state which is a threat because of its greater aggregate power. A determining factor here is hinged on a state’s capability, particularly its military capability. However, the type of military capability that is in question is on a state’s offensive capability which poses the threat to other states.The defensive military capability is not much given attention due to the fact that such capability will not be a threat unless provoked or initiated by another state. But having a strong and threatening offensive capability is not the only distress and apprehension of other states.The level or aggressiveness of a particular state is definitely taken into account. Each state regardless of their capabilities has their own way of responding and not responding to threats and issu es they encounter. Moreover, alliances formed under the concept of balancing are somewhat situational or circumstantial.Although alliances are forged heavily to answer the call of threat, these alliances change dramatically when that threat is conquered or disposed of. Wars seem to be the common cause of most states to form an alliance but the moment the war ends, the alliance breaks as well. As much as alliance through balancing is very much evident and supported by past occurrences, the opposite concept of bandwagoning is as much evident and present as seen during the Cold War. It is therefore asserted that bandwagoning is most likely to happen than balancing.Stephen M. Walt even stresses that any need for a legitimate justification to be involved in international territories or issues can be covered by bandwagoning. Furthermore, bandwagoning is also used as a means of increasing a state’s military capacity.Proponents of bandwagoning see the logic in this concept by simply knowing that the greater a state’s aggregate capability and offensive capability the more likely it is for other states to form an alliance with it. Even the geographical location is taken into consideration.The states that are located near a powerful state shall have a greater tendency of forming an alliance with the powerful state. The location of states geographically in relation to another state particularly with the stronger state is very important especially in times of conflict.This because the issues on borders and the time it takes to send help and information to an ally will largely depend of their positions. And being the opposite of balancing, the states will not align against the powerful state because of its aggressive perceived intentions.And also, the alliances formed against the greater state will disintegrate as a response to a serious obstacle that they realize is already beyond them. Stephen M. Walt states his theory by deducing it from rational and histor ically based assumptions and behavioural patterns which states have already done to point out that what states will most possibly be doing. The past shows times of numerous instances in international relations which act as an example or as a guide in predicting not necessarily the end result but the processes of interactions between states.Stephen M. Walt cites numerous occasions and incidents in the World War and the Cold War as an example for proving his theory. He thus bases his conclusions and hypotheses knowing that there are only limited possible steps or actions that a state can actually make.The assertion of Stephen M. Walt’s theory by quantifying and qualifying a state’s action to form an alliance as a response to an external threat through balancing and bandwagoning as supported by historical bases makes it logically sound.The argument that is proposed takes root in the rational and natural assessment of how exactly a state will respond to the situation prese nted. In other words, the theory is an anticipation of an expected probable outcome.The explanation is implicated in the concepts of balancing and bandwagoning which are two polar manifestations that show that for every action taken or not taken, there is also another option which is the alternative or opposite action taken or not taken.For example, as stated earlier in balancing, the greater the threatening state’s aggregate power, the greater the tendency of others to align against it. While in bandwagoning, the greater the threatening state’s aggregate power, the greater the tendency of others to align with it.The cause and effect implication is simply related to the relationship between one state’s relation with another, a state’s capability and the other state’s capability and most importantly, one’s external threat confronted by a state as manifested by another state.The threat is the absolute indicator or the absolute cause of how a s tate will react. The level of threat will influence every consideration that a state will take into. Technically speaking, in consideration of the cause and effect analysis, it becomes quite obvious that this theory of Stephen M. Walt is a primary response or a better description and explanation of the forming of alliances of states. It is asserted by other theorists that the overlying source for the alliances formed by states is founded on the power relations between states.Thus, the balancing or bandwagoning of states are simply actions to balance the power in the prevailing status quo of the international sphere. But Stephen M. Walt sees that the states do not seek security from power but rather, states seek security from threat.Power can be threat but it can also not be threat. Power is a neutral factor and cannot be seen as a threat unless used as one. While threat on the other hand is a concept that poses danger and concern to a state making it more definite and ideal to thoro ughly and greatly influence the state’s actions.

Seguro médico PPO o HMO y uso en otros estados EE.UU.

En cumplimiento con ACA, tambià ©n conocido como Obamacare, casi todas las personas que residen habitualmente en EE.UU. deben tener seguro mà ©dico. A la hora de comprarlo surge la duda de si es mejor contratar un HMO o un PPO y de si ese seguro cubre accidentes y enfermedades cuando se viaja a otros estados. La importancia de elegir un buen seguro mà ©dico y de tener la cobertura geogrà ¡fica que se necesita es importante no solo desde el punto de vista de la salud sino tambià ©n del econà ³mico. Segà ºn un informe reciente de la Kaiser Family Foundation, uno de cada cuatro estadounidenses entre 18 y 65 aà ±os tiene problemas para pagar las facturas mà ©dicas, a pesar de tener seguro mà ©dico y serà ­a la principal causa de bancarrota en el paà ­s. Este artà ­culo se propone ayudar a evitar esos graves problemas explicando quà © es un HMO y un PPO, las ventajas de cada uno y, finalmente, quà © ocurre si se viaja a otro estado se produce un accidente o surge una enfermedad y se debe buscar asistencia mà ©dica. Tambià ©n aspira despejar la duda de quà © hay que hacer si se tiene un PPO o un HMO pero se desea recibir tratamiento en un hospital en otro estado o consultar con un especialista para obtener una segunda opinià ³n en un estado diferente al de residencia. Finalmente, tambià ©n se alude a cuà ¡les son las opciones para seguros mà ©dicos para migrantes indocumentados y turistas extranjeros.  ¿Quà © significa HMO y PPO en seguro mà ©dico de EE.UU.? Las aseguradoras mà ©dicas ofrecen variaciones de diferentes tipos de contratacià ³n de seguros. Las principales son el las Organizaciones de mantenimiento de la salud (HMO, por sus siglas en inglà ©s) o las Organizaciones de proveedores preferidos (PPO, por sus siglas en inglà ©s). Las aseguradoras contratan servicios profesionales con mà ©dicos, enfermeras, laboratorios, hospitales, farmacias, etc., y HMO y PPO se refiere al tipo de contrato con el que el asegurado va a relacionarse con esos profesionales o servicios sanitarios. El HMO o el PPO puede ser proporcionado por la empresa para la que se trabaja o comprado directamente por el asegurado, ya que en muchos casos las empresas no dan seguro mà ©dico a sus empleados. Sin embargo, entre las que sà ­ lo dan, frecuentemente brindan a los empleados la posibilidad de elegir entre diferentes tipos de HMO y PPO. Informacià ³n bà ¡sica sobre los HMO La contratacià ³n de un HMO da derecho a elegir mà ©dico de atencià ³n primaria, que puede ser un internista o un doctor de familia y tambià ©n a un pediatra. En algunos casos, a un ginecà ³logo dentro de la red de profesionales contratados , conocida en inglà ©s como network. Esos mà ©dicos son el primer punto de contacto con el paciente y se les conoce por el nombre PPC, que son sus siglas en inglà ©s . Son lo que se conoce como PPC, por sus siglas en inglà ©s. Eso significa que en caso de enfermedad o consulta primero hay que cerrar una cita con el PPC. El doctor decidirà ¡ si se necesitan anà ¡lisis, rayos, otros procedimientos o ver a un mà ©dico especialista dentro de la red de servicios mà ©dicos dentro de ese HMO. Si ese es el caso, darà ¡ un volante o referencia, que en inglà ©s se conoce como referral. Si se acude a un profesional o laboratorio fuera de la red, se tendrà ¡ que pagar todo o casi todo el gasto ocasionado por esa visita. Salvo en casos muy concretos, como que la red de del HMO no tenga quien realice un determinado procedimiento, tà ©cnica o carezca de un especialista. En este punto es recomendable leer y tener claras todas las condiciones particulares de cada contrato de seguro mà ©dico. En caso de emergencia se puede ir a cualquier mà ©dico. Pero leer bien y entender claramente lo que en cada caso se considera una emergencia porque si el seguro no lo considera asà ­, el paciente acabarà ¡ pagando por el servicio. En cuanto a los pagos, hay que hacer frente al co-pago cada vez que se va al mà ©dico, servicios extra, ingresos hospitalarios o medicinas. Està ¡n todos especificados en el contrato. Informacià ³n bà ¡sica para entender quà © es un PPO En el PPO no se necesita tener un mà ©dico de cabecera, lo que en el HMO se conoce como PPC. El paciente puede ir a cualquier doctor dentro de la red de profesionales preferidos. Tampoco se necesita un volante o referencia para ir a un especialista dentro de la red. La excepcià ³n suelen ser procedimientos caros, como los MRI. Ademà ¡s, algunos doctores especialistas tienen por costumbre no aceptar pacientes que previamente no han pasado por un mà ©dico de atencià ³n primaria. Ese es un punto que hay que aclarar al cerrar una cita. Si sà ³lo se va a mà ©dicos y hospitales dentro de la red de profesionales preferidos del PPO, sà ³lo se pagarà ¡ el deducible anual (annual deductible, en inglà ©s) y, dependiendo de cada contrato, tambià ©n puede haber un co-pago. El deducible anual es la cantidad de dinero que el paciente debe gastar en servicios mà ©dicos por aà ±o antes de que el seguro comience a actuar. Puede haber uno por persona y otro familiar. Por ejemplo, si el deducible anual es de $250 eso quiere decir que hasta que el paciente haya gastado esa cantidad por aà ±o el seguro no comenzarà ¡ a pagar. Ademà ¡s, si se decide ir a un servicio mà ©dico que no està ¡ incluido en la red de profesionales preferidos – lo que se conoce con el nombre de out-of-network–, deberà ¡ pagarse la factura al completo y luego reclamar al PPO para que regrese parte de ese importe. El porcentaje varà ­a de contrato a contrato. Por ejemplo, si se acude a un doctor fuera de la red de proveedores del PPO y à ©ste cobra $100 por una consulta, el paciente deberà ¡ pagarlos en su totalidad. Posteriormente, si no ha gastado el deducible anual, ahà ­ se queda la cosa. Pero si ya se ha utilizado, entonces se reclama al PPO por un porcentaje fijado previamente en el contrato. Por ejemplo, si fuera un 50 por ciento, eso significarà ­a que la aseguradora regresarà ­a $50 pero de los otros $50 el à ºnico responsable serà ­a el paciente.  ¿Es mejor un HMO o un PPO? Eso depende de las circunstancias de cada asegurado y de las de sus familias. En general puede decirse que el PPO ofrece mà ¡s libertad a la hora de elegir, pero resulta mà ¡s caro. En todo caso, antes de contratar o de utilizar un servicio mà ©dico es muy importante entender bien las particularidades del seguro mà ©dico. No todos los HMO son iguales ni tampoco todos los PPO ofrecen lo mismo. POS, indocumentados y turistas Hay otras posibilidades menos conocidas, como los POS, o plan punto de servicio. Es una mezcla entre un HMO y un PPO ya que los pacientes con este tipo de seguro mà ©dico deben designar a un mà ©dico de cabecera pero pueden visitar profesionales sanitarios fuera de su red. Por otra parte, los migrantes indocumentados no pueden beneficiarse de Obamacare, por lo tanto, no pueden comprar seguro mà ©dico por medio de ese programa. Sin embargo, sà ­ pueden comprar un seguro mà ©dico pero es muy importante asegurarse de que cubren en caso de haber un problema y teniendo en cuenta la situacià ³n migratoria. Ademà ¡s, algunas municipalidades brindan este servicio como, por ejemplo, Los Angeles o San Francisco, a travà ©s del programa Healthy. En todo caso, siempre se tiene derecho a atencià ³n mà ©dica de urgencia, sin importar el estatus legal. Por à ºltimo, como informacià ³n importante para turistas destacar que es importante que viajen a los Estados Unido con seguro mà ©dico, ya que el costo de la medicina en Estados Unidos es muy alto. Si se causa un gasto al sistema pà ºblico como Medicaid esto puede dar lugar a la cancelacià ³n de la visa por considerarse una carga pà ºblica o a su no renovacià ³n. Este punto salta muchas veces en relacià ³n a nacimientos de nià ±os de turistas en los Estados Unidos cuando los padres no han pagado los gastos del alumbramiento. HMO y PPO en otros estados En cumplimiento de Obamacare, todas las personas que tienen en EE.UU. un HMO o un PPO pueden recibir en estados diferentes a los de su residencia habitual tratamientos por emergencias que pongan en riesgo la vida. La à ºnica excepcià ³n es el estado de Hawaii donde esta regla no aplica. Eso no quiere decir que el seguro va a cubrir todo el gasto, sino que ademà ¡s deberà ¡ mirarse las caracterà ­sticas de cada seguro y si se recibià ³ el tratamiento para la emergencia en un hospital dentro de la red o fuera de la red. Antes de viajar a otro estado diferente por razones de trabajo o vacaciones es fundamental saber claramente quà © considera emergencia el seguro de cada uno porque puede que el seguro no la califique como tal y se acaba pagando por el servicio mà ©dico. En el caso de consultas rutinarias, ingresos en hospitales especializados en enfermedades graves o consultas mà ©dicas para obtener una segunda opinià ³n realizadas en estados distintos al del lugar de residencia habitual, los PPO y HMO no cubren ningà ºn gasto. En el pasado podà ­a encontrarse grandes aseguradoras que sà ­ lo hacà ­an, pero ya no es asà ­. Por lo tanto, si se quiere estar asegurado en todo el territorio nacional de los EE.UU. mà ¡s allà ¡ de las emergencias es necesario contratar otro seguro mà ©dico, lo cual puede hacerse de dos formas: cobertura adicional, conocida en inglà ©s como supplemental coveragecompra de un seguro catastrà ³fico, catastrophic coverage en inglà ©s Este es un artà ­culo informativo. No es asesorà ­a legal. Puntos Clave: HMO, PPO y seguro mà ©dico en otros estados HMO: debe elegirse mà ©dico de cabecera y pediatra, Necesarias las referrals para ir a especialista. Menos libertad que PPO pero mà ¡s barato.PPO: se puede ir a mà ©dicos fuera de la red. No son necesarias las referrals. Mà ¡s libertad para elegir mà ©dico pero mà ¡s caro que HMO.Cobertura estados diferentes a los de residencia habitual: solamente emergencias con riesgo para la vida. Hawaii siempre excluido.Seguro para otros estados para viajes, por trabajo, segunda opinià ³n mà ©dica, etc: comprar seguro adicional o catastrà ³fico. Este es un artà ­culo informativo. No es asesorà ­a legal.